San Francisco Cannabis Clubs

San Francisco Cannabis Clubs TM

Medical Marijuana

SF Medical Marijuana News San Francisco Medical Marijuana News Feed

Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Must Release Names, Addresses Of Pot Growers
Read full story...
San Francisco and Daly City drug raids net eight arrests, $450,000 in pot
Read full story...
Where's Gascon on Ammiano's pot bill?
Read full story...
IRS tells Fairfax medical marijuana dispensary it owes millions in unpaid taxes
Read full story...
California's Next Attorney General Can't Punt On Marijuana
Read full story...

Oral Arguments in Rosenthal Appeal

By Americans for Safe Access
Published January 12, 2009

The fundamental issue in Rosenthal’s appeal is the right of defendants to present a complete and effective defense in cases where there is a conflict between state and federal law. If his conviction is allowed to stand, it could have a chilling effect on local officials and others whenever there is a risk that an overzealous federal prosecutor will attempt to criminalize their efforts to promote controversial state and local initiatives.
In 2003, medical marijuana advocate Ed Rosenthal was convicted for growing and distributing marijuana even though he was encouraged to do so by Oakland City officials as part of the city’s efforts to promote safe distribution of marijuana to patients. The Ninth Circuit overturned his conviction in 2006, but Rosenthal was retried and convicted in a second trial.

Among the specific questions that Michael Clough, Rosenthal’s lead attorney, will ask the appellate panel to decide are:

(1) Whether the jury should have been allowed to hear evidence that Rosenthal acted on good faith belief that he had been deputized by the City of Oakland.

(2) Whether, given the complex and unsettled nature of constitutional precedents governing differences in federal and state laws with regard to issues such as medical marijuana, Rosenthal should have been allowed to present a defense based on mistake of law.

(3) Whether Rosenthal should have been allowed to offer testimony by Oakland City officials to negate the allegation that he was involved in an unlawful conspiracy.

(4) Whether the trial judge, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer, denied Rosenthal’s constitutional right to testify in his own defense when he ruled that Rosenthal could testify but not be allowed to present witnesses to corroborate his claim that he believed he was lawfully acting to further regulations enacted by the Oakland City council to ensure the safe distribution of marijuana to lawful patients.

Please do your best to attend to show your support.

Date:
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Time: 9:00 AM - 9:30 AM
Address: James R Browning US Courthouse get directions
95 7th St @ MIssion
San Francisco, California 94103


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

About Us | Advertise | Resources | Site Map | Link to Us | Contact Us |
Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
© 2006 - 2012 San Francisco Cannabis Clubs TM

Member of Americans for Safe Access Member of National Organization to Reform Marijuana Laws